I am The Consensus

The Consensus has spoken

Canadian Peacekeepers: From Loons to Hawks?

n504389675_81226_2707


The popular image of Canada as a peace-keeping nation will not last long if our government maintains the path of aiding and abetting American aggression. There will be no more cases like Adam Budzanowski’s. The man who was captured by Palestinian men in March 2006 but released unharmed and almost immediately after they saw his Canadian passport. Budzanowski said that his captors released him saying “We love Canada”.

It is surprising that Canada has maintained an image of fairness and even-handedness in the eyes of the Arab world. In 1987 Canada was regarded as second only to the US in its support for Israel in the UN, and we were also the first ones to cut aid to the democratically elected ‘Hamas’ in Palestine. Our unconditional support for Israel was reiterated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper three years ago when he refused to condemn Israel’s assault on Lebanon, and defended Israel’s bombings by saying that it was a “measured” response. This barbaric onslaught was still labeled as a “measured” response even after many innocent civilians, including 8 Canadians, were slaughtered.

Although Canada has almost always followed the US on major issues; nowhere in recent times has our support been more pronounced than with the Martin and Harper governments. Canada’s following in the footsteps of its powerful neighbour by pursuing a more militaristic agenda. Harper’s plan is to increase Canadian military spending from $13 billion in 2005 to $21.5 billion by 2010,  which is supposed to be making Canadians feel safer. However, contrary to what the current incumbents in Ottawa claim about Canada being in dire need of a military build up in order to be safe and protected, most Canadians will tell us that they feel pretty secure from outside threats. That is probably due to our status as a peacekeeping nation, so therefore countries and terrorists alike see no real reason to attack us. Most rational intellectuals would agree that the threat of a terrorist attack is higher in countries that intervene in other nations. That should be quite obvious, but it seems that our leaders need to be reminded of this simple truth.

Canada really has no sound explanation for its involvement in the war in Afghanistan. There’s no real evidence that suggests that we’re actually making a positive difference in Afghanistan. But we’re constantly bombarded by our elitist media to “support our troops in Afghanistan” which is really a foolish demand, because it makes it seem as if it was our troops that actually made a conscious decision to go to Afghanistan and fight a war, when in fact it was our government that sent them there. The media is implying that if we don’t “support our troops” then we’re ungrateful for the sacrifices they’re making. My discontent with the war in Afghanistan does not stem from my distaste for our troops (believe me, there is no such distaste), but rather due to our government’s decision to follow such an aggressive and imperialist agenda against an already impoverished nation. It has nothing to do with supporting our troops, rather everything to do with our government’s involvement in the war. So at this moment, the doctrine “Support our troops” translates to “Provide absolute support for our government’s antagonistic policies”. So no, I’m not going to get any of those t-shirts that say “Support our Troops in Afghanistan” that Don Cherry was trying to sell to the viewers during a hockey game.

Most Canadians don’t wish to partake in international aggression, but this seems to be path we’re headed towards. With this new role, Canada’s reputation as the just nation devoted to peace-keeping will be in jeopardy. Prime Minister Stephen Harper actually wanted to send our troops to Iraq as well, but fortunately he wasn’t in office at that time. He criticized the Chretien government’s refusal to go in to Iraq, but when he saw that the war was turning in to a lost cause for the Americans, he claimed he wouldn’t have sent our troops there either, and that staying out of the war was a good idea. But to appease its neighbours, who were bitter at our unwillingness to participate in the war against Iraq, Canada had to redeem itself.

In February 2004 a coalition of U.S., Canada and France invaded and ousted the Haitian president at gunpoint.

Canada has made a significant contribution to stability in Haiti,” – George W. Bush after meeting with Prime Minister Stephen Harper in July 2006

If by ‘stability’ he meant the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Jean-Bertrand Aristide much to the discomfort of the Haitian people in 2004, then yes Canada did play a significant role. The shocking part is how much our media and politicians have undermined our role there, and the fact that no one has been held accountable for these crimes that were committed against the Haitian people. An estimated 8,000 people have died since the coup in the capital Port-Au-Prince alone. It is astonishing that our government is somehow, if not directly, responsible for these deaths. The scheme of the coup was planned in the Ottawa Haiti Initiative meeting in 2003. The excuse we used was that we have a “responsibility to protect”. It begs the question, responsibility to protect who and against what? It is obvious that this is not for the protection of the people of Haiti. Is it for the protection of Canada, the US, and France perhaps? But none of these countries were under any sort of military threat from the poorest nation in the western hemisphere. So it was our responsibility to protect the economic interests of the powerful nations that were involved in the overthrow. Aristide simply didn’t comply to western demands like a good leader ought to. So therefore his defiance had to be punished as an example to other nations.

It is our duty and moral responsibility to know the truth. In this day and age there is no excuse for ignorance, especially if you live in a wealthy nation such as Canada. It’s about time that we Canadians step out of the bliss that is ignorance and acknowledge the bitterness of truth.

Much of the research that went in to this blog came from Linda McQuaig’s new book titled ‘Holding the Bully’s Coat’. I urge all to read it.

Advertisements

October 6, 2009 - Posted by | Uncategorized

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: